I had this thought after my post about supportive psychotherapy in psychiatry. In the experience of most psychiatrists, it plays a major role. The related questions are – why isn’t that role acknowledged and why are psychiatrists even reluctant to use the term. I had the thought that it is due to compartmentalization and before I research that concept to see if anything has been written about it - I thought I would write down my observations.
The first thing that comes to mind is the idea that
psychotherapy needs to be provided according to a specific formal or informal
protocol and a prescribed number of sessions. Psychoanalysis is the obvious
prototype of a specific method that can include the number of sessions and
approximate duration of therapy. Over
the years the method has been adapted to shorter courses including crisis
intervention and both transference- based and non-transference-based
psychotherapies. Psychodynamic therapy
has been manualized (Klerman, Strupp, Luborsky) and adapted to both crisis
intervention (Viederman) and short-term settings (Sifenos, Gustafson). Hybrid versions such as psychodynamic and
cognitive behavioral therapy (Garret) and existential-psychodynamic therapies
(Yalom) have been developed. Complex developments like this probably have many
people questioning where to draw the lines.
The second issue is how all these developments fit into psychiatric practice. You can be a psychoanalyst and maintain well defined courses of therapy and a consistent technique. Some psychoanalysts practice part time and have a separate psychiatric practice.
A third issue is how supportive psychotherapy gets
implemented in more common types of practice.
The most common expectation of employed psychiatrists these days is
seeing 3 or 4 new patients a day and another 8-10 follow up patients. Most of the practice includes patients with
severe psychiatric disorders that require medical treatment and ongoing
assessment and treatment of both medical and psychiatric disorders.
An exciting idea is the ability to provide supportive
psychotherapy to all people seen in those settings. A common stereotype promoted in the press is
the idea that people are seen for medications only. The usual reasons given is that this is the
best way for psychiatrists to make money and/or it is a sign that
pharmaceutical companies have manipulated psychiatrists into providing care
this way. I have illustrated many times
on this blog that all those ideas are incorrect. Today I want to approach the issue form the
perspective of psychotherapy.
It is very difficult to maintain any kind of useful
relationship with a patient solely discussing medications. That is true for any
physician but most importantly psychiatrists. What else happens in those
appointments? Non medication related situations are discussed. Life is inevitable and people who are
stabilized on medications still encounter stressors and crises just like
everyone else. The main difference is
that most of the people seeing psychiatrists have major psychiatric disorders
that can be destabilized by stress. They
also have first-hand experience with medications that have been useful in the
course of their illness. In those situations,
there needs to be a detailed discussion of whether the crisis represents an
exacerbation of the primary disorder or something else. That appointment will
typically require more than an answer to that question. The patient wants to
feel understood by a person who knows them well, wants to leave the appointment
feeling better then when they arrived, and wants some ideas about what can be
done to alleviate their suffering. A prescription may be added or changed but
it is not the primary intervention in that scenario – supportive psychotherapy
is.
Even in scenarios where consultations are done in high
acuity settings – there needs to be enough flexibility to recognize the true
nature of the problem and intervene psychotherapeutically. The following vignette illustrates that
point:
The patient is a 70-yr old woman who was acutely admitted
to the CCU with chest pain to rule out a myocardial infarction. On day 2, the
Cardiologist caring for her sends a psychiatry consult because he is concerned
that she is depressed and a possible suicide risk. The psychiatric consultant sees her and
observes a depressed appearing women who seems healthy and vigorous. The consultant notes she recently retired as
the CEO of a large company and is having some difficulty adapting to that
transition. She had anticipated
travelling in retirement but her husband has a chronic illness and she is the
primary caregiver. The discussion
focused on the role transition and existential issues associated with
retirement. She agreed to follow up
discussions in the outpatient clinic.
Following the consultation – the consultant met with the Cardiologist
and explained the formulation, that antidepressants did not seem to be
indicated, and that a suicide risk assessment had been done and that the risk
was low and that inpatient treatment was not indicated.
In the example above this was a typical extensive
consultation done on medical-surgical patients.
Psychiatric consultation is critical in these situations because it
affects the discharge process of beds with rapid turnover and keeping a patient
there longer than necessary can be a major problem. Despite the intensity of
that information gathering the consultant can do a supportive psychotherapeutic
intervention that the patient was interested in pursuing. It requires a
consultant who can quickly identify the relevant theme for psychotherapeutic
intervention. I would see this as a problem in pattern recognition that does
not seem to be discussed very much in the psychotherapeutic literature. Most of the discussion of patterns is focused
on object relations and the recurrent themes in relationships, although
Klerman, et al discuss role transitions as a potential cause of depression.
The existentialist may say that meaningfulness may be a better
conceptualization.
This is one of many examples of how psychotherapy does not
need to be compartmentalized as a separate intervention and can be added into the assessment or any scheduled appointment.
Instead of thinking of psychotherapy as a 40-50 minute block of time
once a week – can it be 10-20 minutes weekly in addition to everything else
occurring in that appointment?
People tend to think of psychiatric appointments these days
as “med checks”. This was modified slightly
a few years ago when psychiatrists were allowed to use standard E&M
(Evaluation and Management) billing codes like all medical and surgical
specialists. There is a complexity
dimension and even a psychotherapy dimension.
The main problem with all these billing codes is that they are not
reality. They need to be completed to get reimbursement and they need to be
completed in a rigid stereotyped way – but they cannot be counted on to reflect
the reality of the session. They are constructed for business purposes and not
clinical purposes and that is evident if you read a handful of the notes. You are likely to see a template of required bullet points that are generally headings of evaluations or symptom lists. They contain limited useful information and
nothing about the real exchange between the patient and the psychiatrist. They say nothing about the shared experience
in the room or the quality of that relationship.
That also suggests a lesser-known form of supportive
psychotherapy and that is existential therapy.
In psychiatry, existential psychotherapy leads to association to work by
Victor Frankl, Ludwig Binswanger, Leston Havens, and Irwin Yalom. Although there are some academic psychology
departments that specialize in it, most of the psychiatrists and psychologists
I know who were self-identified were trained as psychodynamic therapists or
psychoanalysts first. Yalom had stated that is probably the best training for
existential therapy and most available. For this post, an interesting
adaptation of existential therapy is the application to brief visits suggested
by Ghaemi and co-authors.
As you study existential psychotherapy – arriving at a
coherent current approach and strategy may seem like an impossible task. Some
of the early work by Minkowski and that work reviewed by Havens includes some
techniques that I have encountered in other therapies – like paradoxical
intention. Binswanger’s description of approaching a patient with mania is
probably the most accessible. The best
distillation of the process is probably Ghaemi’s 2018 description of
existential psychopharmacotherapy. He
suggests an open-ended interview style – even in patients being seen for brief
medication-based visits. The goal is to encourage spontaneity and
expression. Allow the patient to provide
the narrative that they think is the most important. Questions relevant to the medication can be
asked later in the interview – but the more open format allows the patient to
describe their current problems, symptoms, and adverse effects in their own terms
rather than the rigid descriptors of the DSM or associated checklists. Most
importantly the interview is focused on phenomenology or the personal internal
state of that patient rather than group averaging that may not apply. In the
context of empathic understanding by the psychiatrist – the patient feels
understood and the therapeutic alliance is enhanced. The alliance is necessary
for discussions of the treatment plan, its modification, and informed consent. This
is a common form of psychiatric practice, although most practitioners would be
hard pressed to discuss it as an existential approach. Many do describe it as
supportive or humanistic. Consistent with the compartmentalization theme of
this post – most psychiatrists do not think of it as therapy even though it is
a critical aspect of psychiatric practice.
Psychodynamic therapies also have several short-term
approaches and like existential psychopharmacology. Some of those authors have described
approaches that can be used in crisis intervention with or without medication
and during brief visits with a medication focus. Gustafson discusses specific implementations
as common dynamics in psychiatry. He discusses a trial intervention that can be
done in less than 10 minutes. It is
primarily a clarification that makes sense of the current anxiety or depressive
state as a natural consequence of what they may be trying to avoid and provides
a theory for the mood state. I have seen
similar interventions used in cognitive behavioral therapy.
I hope that I have been clear about the issue of
compartmentalization in psychotherapy.
It can occur at the macro level with the silos of major therapies (some
200 by one estimate). Thise silos are often reinforced by practitioners engaged
in debates about the design of trials, efficacy, and who is the most
“evidence-based”. Even after those
technical and political issues are brushed aside, practitioners are faced with rigid
ideas about how psychotherapy needs to be provided. The reality is that every
encounter with a psychiatrist should be conducted as though it is
psychotherapeutic and there are plenty of options to consider. The good news is that I am sure a lot of it
is occurring already – but because of the classification problem – it is not
being counted.
George Dawson, MD, DFAPA
Frankl VE. Logotherapy and existential analysis—a review.
American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1966 Apr;20(2):252-60.
Binswanger L. On the
manic mode of being-in-the-world.
In: Strauss E. Phenomenology Pure
and Applied. Pittsburgh. Duquesne University Press; 1964.
Yalom ID. Existential
Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books; 1980.
Längle A. From Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy to existential
analytic psychotherapy. European psychotherapy. 2015 Feb 18;12:67-83.
Havens LL. The existential use of the self. Am J Psychiatry.
1974 Jan;131(1):1-10. doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.1.1. PMID: 4808428.
Havens LL. The development of existential psychiatry (Karl
Jaspers, E. Minkowski, and Otto Binswanger). J Nerv Ment Dis. 1972
May;154(5):309-31. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197205000-00001. PMID: 4554757.
Ghaemi SN. Rediscovering existential psychotherapy: the
contribution of Ludwig Binswanger. Am J Psychother. 2001;55(1):51-64. doi:
10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2001.55.1.51. PMID: 11291191.
Ghaemi SN. Feeling and time: the phenomenology of mood
disorders, depressive realism, and existential psychotherapy. Schizophr Bull.
2007 Jan;33(1):122-30. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl061. Epub 2006 Nov 22. PMID:
17122410; PMCID: PMC2632297.
Ghaemi SN, Glick ID, Ellison JM. A Commentary on Existential
Psychopharmacologic Clinical Practice: Advocating a Humanistic Approach to the
"Med Check". J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 24;79(4):18ac12177. doi:
10.4088/JCP.18ac12177. PMID: 29701934.
Gustafson JP. Reading
the ability of the patient to change his or her life. Psychiatric Times. February 2007, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/reading-ability-patient-change-his-or-her-life
Photo Credit:
Many thanks to Eduardo Colon, MD for allowing me to use his photos.