An historic film by John Huston on PTSD is available at:
http://www.filmpreservation.org/preserved-films/screening-room/let-there-be-light-1946
This is an actual film of veterans being treated. Very interesting film from an historic and psychiatric perspective. Also interesting from a propaganda perspective. One of my first teachers in psychiatry was a WWII psychiatrist who went through an expedited residency in order to treat combat neurosis. The attached notes about the making of the films is also interesting in terms of the way it is structured, the total footage shot to get this final cut version and why this particular facility was used.
http://www.filmpreservation.org/preserved-films/screening-room/let-there-be-light-1946
This is an actual film of veterans being treated. Very interesting film from an historic and psychiatric perspective. Also interesting from a propaganda perspective. One of my first teachers in psychiatry was a WWII psychiatrist who went through an expedited residency in order to treat combat neurosis. The attached notes about the making of the films is also interesting in terms of the way it is structured, the total footage shot to get this final cut version and why this particular facility was used.
As an example Huston comments on the treatment
process at the hospital he chose for the film: " The hospital admitted two groups of 75
patients each week, and the goal was to restore these men physically, mentally
and emotionally within six to eight weeks, to the point where they could be
returned to civilian life in as good condition—or almost as good—as when they
came into the Army… " Just doing the arithmetic, with what we know about the scale of WWII, that would suggest that most veterans with PTSD never got treated.
He also commented on the goal of the film: "[The
purpose] was to show how men who suffered mental damage in the service should
not be written off but could be helped by psychiatric treatment….". That message seems to continuously escape the politicians responsible for war making and repairing the damage afterwards.
The original film was suppressed by the Army and the US
Government who suggested that privacy considerations were the reason. All the men in the film had signed releases
for the filming, but at one point those releases disappeared. During an attempted screening of the film,
military police showed up and confiscated a copy. The author of the Film Notes suggests a few reasons for the suppression of the film
as well as discussing the innovative and artistic points.
From a psychiatric standpoint, the use of drug therapy by
psychiatrists in film was cutting edge. According to Gabbard and Gabbard
the first film depictions of drug therapy occurred in 1947 (Possessed)
and 1949 (The Home of the Brave). In their book they mention Let
There Be Light (1946) as the
third depiction of narcosynthesis. It also reminded
me of The Snake Pit (1948) in that the
psychiatrists are portrayed as being generally effective.
From a cultural and political standpoint, the film and
Huston’s intentions stand in contrast to the atmosphere today where psychiatrists
are portrayed in the media as inept tools of pharmaceutical companies who
thrive on prescribing ineffective treatments.
In the film notes section, Huston describes the transformation of some
of the patients as “miraculous”. At some
level, there has to be skepticism on the treatment effort and outcomes. For example, there is an overall lack of
aggression and severe depression in the veterans filmed for this project. In my experience in several different VA facilities
those are common problems as a result of combat stress exposure.
As a kid walking 5 blocks to elementary school every day,
I encountered veterans with clear problems that were explained to me at the
time as being “due to the war.” In some
cases more specific etiologies were suggested like: “he got malaria in the war”. That was in the late 1950s.
As a civilian, I had no idea what exposure to combat stress could do until I was a psychiatric resident working in a VA hospital. By that time we had already been through the Vietnam War and any consideration of the impact that war had on veterans was secondary to the over-the-top politics associated with an unnecessary war.
As a civilian, I had no idea what exposure to combat stress could do until I was a psychiatric resident working in a VA hospital. By that time we had already been through the Vietnam War and any consideration of the impact that war had on veterans was secondary to the over-the-top politics associated with an unnecessary war.
Maybe things would have been a lot different if the Army
had allowed a broad release of this film.
George Dawson, MD, DFAPA
George Dawson, MD, DFAPA
Gabbard K, Gabbard GO. Psychiatry and the Cinema.
The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, (1987) p 70-71.
No comments:
Post a Comment